ieee access | Journament

Journal Ranking

#64 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 hours ago

ieee access

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name ieee access
Abbreviated Name ieee access
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (308 total)

2015
examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: insights from the front range roundtable, colorado, usa
;Antony S. Cheng;Andrea K. Gerlak;Lisa Dale;Katherine Mattor
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 35-
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mixture-model-based graph for privacy-preserving semi-supervised learning
Li, Z.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
355 views DOI
2014
the influence of socioeconomic factors on traditional knowledge: a cross scale comparison of palm use in northwestern south america
;Narel Y. Paniagua-Zambrana;Rodrigo Camara-Lerét;Rainer W. Bussmann;Manuel J. Macía
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 9-
323 views DOI Abstract
2012
implementing participatory water management: recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation
;Yorck von Korff;Katherine A. Daniell;Sabine Moellenkamp;Pieter Bots;Rianne M. Bijlsma
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 30-
318 views DOI Abstract
2006
science for the poor: how one woman challenged researchers, ranchers, and loggers in amazonia
;Patricia Shanley
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 28-
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigating thermal cooling mechanisms of human body under exposure to electromagnetic radiation
Zhang H.
Vol. 7 , pp. 9697-9703
317 views DOI
2019
Investigating thermal cooling mechanisms of human body under exposure to electromagnetic radiation
Zhang H.
Vol. 7 , pp. 9697-9703
316 views DOI
2011
debt-for-nature swaps in action: two case studies in peru
;Catherine Kilbane. Gockel;Leslie C. Gray
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 13-
316 views DOI Abstract
2013
results chains: a tool for conservation action design, management, and evaluation
;Richard Margoluis;Caroline Stem;Vinaya Swaminathan;Marcia Brown;Arlyne Johnson;Guillermo Placci;Nick Salafsky;Ilke Tilders
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 22-
314 views DOI Abstract
2010
robustness, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity in small-scale social-ecological systems: the pumpa irrigation system in nepal
;Oguzhan Cifdaloz;Ashok Regmi;John M. Anderies;Armando A. Rodriguez
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 39-
301 views DOI Abstract
View All 308 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
35
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.