Indexed in Journament

Nurse education today

ISSN 1532-2793· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,304 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
101 Articles
Scores higher than 54.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal's high academic and ethical standards. The journal employs a double blind peer review process for all submissions and its current Impact Factor is 2.533 making it one of the leading nursing education journals (2016 Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate Analytics 2017).
Short Name Nurse Educ Today
Abbreviated Name net
ISSN 1532-2793
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/nurse-education-today
Author Instructions https://www.elsevier.com/journals/nurse-education-today/0260-6917/guide-for-authors

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 32.1 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.2
Content Distribution 69.0 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (101)

2020
Development and testing of an evidence-based model of mentoring nursing students in clinical practice
Mikkonen, K.
Vol. 85 , pp. 0-0
665 views DOI Abstract
2014
Developing compassion through a relationship centred appreciative leadership programme.
Dewar, Belinda;Cook, Fiona;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1258-64
492 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship of personality traits and entrepreneurship tendencies with career adaptability of nursing students.
İspir, Öznur;Elibol, Esengül;Sönmez, Betül;
Vol. 79 , pp. 41-47
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of a simulation-based education program for nursing students responding to mass casualty incidents: A pre-post intervention study.
Kim, Jina;Lee, Ogcheol;
Vol. 85 , pp. 104297
462 views DOI Abstract
2016
Exploring the impact of parental post-traumatic stress disorder on military family children: A review of the literature.
King, Natalie;Smith, Alison;
Vol. 47 , pp. 29-36
435 views DOI Abstract
2018
Nursing and midwifery students' stress and coping during their undergraduate education programmes: An integrative review.
McCarthy, Bridie;Trace, Anna;O'Donovan, Moira;Brady-Nevin, Caroline;Murphy, Margaret;O'Shea, Maria;O'Regan, Patricia;
Vol. 61 , pp. 197-209
434 views DOI Abstract
2011
The impact of an integrated pharmacology and medicines management curriculum for undergraduate adult nursing students on the acquisition of applied drug/pharmacology knowledge.
Meechan, Ronnie;Mason, Victoria;Catling, Jon;
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 383-9
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact on nursing students' opinions and motivation of using a "Nursing Escape Room" as a teaching game: A descriptive study.
Gómez-Urquiza, Jose L;Gómez-Salgado, Juan;Albendín-García, Luis;Correa-Rodríguez, María;González-Jiménez, Emilio;Cañadas-De la Fuente, Guillermo A;
Vol. 72 , pp. 73-76
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of debate-based ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
Kim, W.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
412 views DOI
2020
Clinical mentors' experiences of their intercultural communication competence in mentoring culturally and linguistically diverse nursing students: A qualitative study.
Hagqvist, Pia;Oikarainen, Ashlee;Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria;Juntunen, Jonna;Mikkonen, Kristina;
Vol. 87 , pp. 104348
408 views DOI Abstract
2021
Nursing graduates' lived experiences of anxiety during their final year at University: a phenomenological study.
Sun, Fan-Ko;Phil, Ann Long D;Chiang, Chun-Ying;Yang, Ching-Ju;Lu, Chu-Yun;
Vol. 96 , pp. 104614
101 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anaesthesia nursing competence: Self-assessment of nursing students.
Jeon, Yunsuk;Ritmala-Castrén, Marita;Meretoja, Riitta;Vahlberg, Tero;Leino-Kilpi, Helena;
Vol. 94 , pp. 104575
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
The relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and work readiness in new graduate nurses: A pre-post survey study.
Dudley, Mietta;Khaw, Damien;Botti, Mari;Hutchinson, Anastasia F;
Vol. 94 , pp. 104587
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hofstede's cultural dimensions as the explanatory framework for performance issues during clinical placement: A mixed methods study.
Rojo, Jacqueline;Everett, Bronwyn;Ramjan, Lucie M;Hunt, Leanne;Salamonson, Yenna;
Vol. 94 , pp. 104581
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Introduction of patient electronic medical records (EMR) into undergraduate nursing education: An integrated literature review
Vol. 94 , pp. 104517-
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Virtual and augmented reality: Implications for the future of nursing education
Vol. 93 , pp. 104531-
199 views DOI
2020
Read it in books: Literary fiction as a tool to develop moral thinking in the educator
Vol. 94 , pp. 104538-
156 views DOI
2020
Providing trans-affirming care for sexual assault survivors: An evaluation of a novel curriculum for forensic nurses
Vol. 93 , pp. 104541-
190 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge and risk perception of radiation for Japanese nursing students after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster
Vol. 94 , pp. 104552-
179 views DOI Abstract
2020
Factors affecting nursing students' creativity in Taiwan: Exploring the moderating role of creative personality
Liu, H.
Vol. 88 , pp. 0-0
59 views DOI
Journament Score
32.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,304 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.