Nurse education today | Journament

Journal Ranking

#880 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

Nurse education today

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Nurse Educ Today
Abbreviated Name net
ISSN 1532-2793
Aim and Scope
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal's high academic and ethical standards. The journal employs a double blind peer review process for all submissions and its current Impact Factor is 2.533 making it one of the leading nursing education journals (2016 Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate Analytics 2017).
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/nurse-education-today
Author Instructions https://www.elsevier.com/journals/nurse-education-today/0260-6917/guide-for-authors
Added by Said Nadeem on Aug 28, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (101 total)

2020
Development and testing of an evidence-based model of mentoring nursing students in clinical practice
Mikkonen, K.
Vol. 85 , pp. 0-0
612 views DOI Abstract
2014
Developing compassion through a relationship centred appreciative leadership programme.
Dewar, Belinda;Cook, Fiona;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1258-64
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship of personality traits and entrepreneurship tendencies with career adaptability of nursing students.
İspir, Öznur;Elibol, Esengül;Sönmez, Betül;
Vol. 79 , pp. 41-47
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of a simulation-based education program for nursing students responding to mass casualty incidents: A pre-post intervention study.
Kim, Jina;Lee, Ogcheol;
Vol. 85 , pp. 104297
397 views DOI Abstract
2016
Exploring the impact of parental post-traumatic stress disorder on military family children: A review of the literature.
King, Natalie;Smith, Alison;
Vol. 47 , pp. 29-36
395 views DOI Abstract
2018
Nursing and midwifery students' stress and coping during their undergraduate education programmes: An integrative review.
McCarthy, Bridie;Trace, Anna;O'Donovan, Moira;Brady-Nevin, Caroline;Murphy, Margaret;O'Shea, Maria;O'Regan, Patricia;
Vol. 61 , pp. 197-209
394 views DOI Abstract
2011
The impact of an integrated pharmacology and medicines management curriculum for undergraduate adult nursing students on the acquisition of applied drug/pharmacology knowledge.
Meechan, Ronnie;Mason, Victoria;Catling, Jon;
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 383-9
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical mentors' experiences of their intercultural communication competence in mentoring culturally and linguistically diverse nursing students: A qualitative study.
Hagqvist, Pia;Oikarainen, Ashlee;Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria;Juntunen, Jonna;Mikkonen, Kristina;
Vol. 87 , pp. 104348
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of debate-based ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
Kim, W.
Vol. 83 , pp. 0-0
362 views DOI
2019
The impact on nursing students' opinions and motivation of using a "Nursing Escape Room" as a teaching game: A descriptive study.
Gómez-Urquiza, Jose L;Gómez-Salgado, Juan;Albendín-García, Luis;Correa-Rodríguez, María;González-Jiménez, Emilio;Cañadas-De la Fuente, Guillermo A;
Vol. 72 , pp. 73-76
359 views DOI Abstract
View All 101 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
32
45
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.