Comparative evaluation of urinary dipstick and pH-meter for cattle urine pH measurement.

Clicks: 365
ID: 99145
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #101 of 235 articles by views in Heliyon

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 235 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Urinary dipsticks are often used for the diagnosis of kidney, liver, metabolic, and urogenital diseases in cattle clinical practice for the simplicity of use and ease of access. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the agreement between urinary dipsticks and pH-meter for the urine pH in dairy cattle, and also to compare the urine pH before and after centrifugation from each method. The agreement between urine dipstick and pH-meter methods before and after centrifuge were calculated by Passing-Bablok regression analysis demonstrated constant differences (intercept) at 0.60 and -1.01 and positive proportional differences (slope) at 0.94 and 1.13; respectively. Total bias estimated by Bland-Altman plot analysis before (0.20) and after (0.14) centrifuge were lower than the acceptable bias in urine samples. The regression analysis of this study emphasized that the urinary dipstick can be used to determine the cattle urine.
Reference Key
afsahi2020comparativeheliyon Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Afsahi, Ali;Ahmadi-Hamedani, Mahmood;Khodadi, Mohammad;
Journal Heliyon
Year 2020
DOI
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03316
URL
Keywords
Veterinary medicine agriculture health sciences cattle urine bland-altman passing-bablock

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.