Multidisciplinary Flux and Multiple Research Traditions Within Cognitive Science.

Clicks: 370
ID: 95814
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 8 articles by views in topics in cognitive science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Núñez et al. (2019) argue that cognitive science has failed either "to transition to a mature inter-disciplinary coherent field" (p. 782) or "to generate a successful [Lakatosian] research program" (p. 789). We argue that the former was never the intention of many early researchers within the field, while the latter is an inappropriate criterion by which to judge an entire discipline. However, we concur with Núñez et al. (2019) that the individual disciplinary balance within cognitive science has changed over time. Of particular concern is the fact that the use of computational methods appears to be on the wane.
Reference Key
cooper2019multidisciplinarytopics Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cooper, Richard P;
Journal topics in cognitive science
Year 2019
DOI
10.1111/tops.12460
URL
Keywords
interdisciplinarity multidisciplinarity lakatosian research program submission trends

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.