A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.

Clicks: 306
ID: 91125
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #12 of 14 articles by views in the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the international union against tuberculosis and lung disease

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Low serum concentrations of first-line tuberculosis (TB) drugs have been widely reported. However, the impact of low serum concentrations on treatment outcome is less well studied. A systematic search of MEDLINE/Pubmed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 31 March 2018 was conducted for articles describing drug concentrations of first-line TB drugs and treatment outcome in adult patients with drug-susceptible TB. The search identified 3073 unique publication abstracts, which were reviewed for suitability: 21 articles were acceptable for inclusion in the qualitative analysis comprising 13 prospective observational cohorts, 4 retrospective observational cohorts, 1 case-control study and 3 randomised controlled trials. Data for meta-analysis were available for 15 studies, 13 studies of rifampicin (RMP), 10 of isoniazid (INH), 8 of pyrazinamide (PZA) and 4 of ethambutol (EMB). This meta-analysis revealed that low PZA concentration appears to increase the risk of poor outcomes (8 studies, = 2727; RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.10-2.72), low RMP concentrations may slightly increase the risk of poor outcomes (13 studies, = 2753; RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.91-2.16), whereas low concentrations of INH (10 studies, = 2640; RR 1.32, 95%CI 0.66-2.63) and EMB (4 studies, = 551; RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.41-3.05) appear to make no difference to treatment outcome. There was no significant publication bias or between-study heterogeneity in any of the analyses. The potential clinical impact of low concentrations of PZA and RMP warrants further evaluation. Also, comprehensive assessments of the complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in the treatment of TB are urgently needed.
Reference Key
perumal2020athe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Perumal, R;Naidoo, K;Naidoo, A;Ramachandran, G;Requena-Mendez, A;Sekaggya-Wiltshire, C;Mpagama, S G;Matteelli, A;Fehr, J;Heysell, S K;Padayatchi, N;
Journal the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the international union against tuberculosis and lung disease
Year 2020
DOI
10.5588/ijtld.19.0025
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.