A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.
Clicks: 306
ID: 91125
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
306 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #12 of 14 articles by views in the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the international union against tuberculosis and lung disease
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Low serum concentrations of first-line tuberculosis (TB) drugs have been widely reported. However, the impact of low serum concentrations on treatment outcome is less well studied. A systematic search of MEDLINE/Pubmed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 31 March 2018 was conducted for articles describing drug concentrations of first-line TB drugs and treatment outcome in adult patients with drug-susceptible TB. The search identified 3073 unique publication abstracts, which were reviewed for suitability: 21 articles were acceptable for inclusion in the qualitative analysis comprising 13 prospective observational cohorts, 4 retrospective observational cohorts, 1 case-control study and 3 randomised controlled trials. Data for meta-analysis were available for 15 studies, 13 studies of rifampicin (RMP), 10 of isoniazid (INH), 8 of pyrazinamide (PZA) and 4 of ethambutol (EMB). This meta-analysis revealed that low PZA concentration appears to increase the risk of poor outcomes (8 studies, = 2727; RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.10-2.72), low RMP concentrations may slightly increase the risk of poor outcomes (13 studies, = 2753; RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.91-2.16), whereas low concentrations of INH (10 studies, = 2640; RR 1.32, 95%CI 0.66-2.63) and EMB (4 studies, = 551; RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.41-3.05) appear to make no difference to treatment outcome. There was no significant publication bias or between-study heterogeneity in any of the analyses. The potential clinical impact of low concentrations of PZA and RMP warrants further evaluation. Also, comprehensive assessments of the complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in the treatment of TB are urgently needed.
| Reference Key |
perumal2020athe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Perumal, R;Naidoo, K;Naidoo, A;Ramachandran, G;Requena-Mendez, A;Sekaggya-Wiltshire, C;Mpagama, S G;Matteelli, A;Fehr, J;Heysell, S K;Padayatchi, N; |
| Journal | the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the international union against tuberculosis and lung disease |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.5588/ijtld.19.0025
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.