An automated nowcasting model of significant instability events in the flight terminal area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Clicks: 272
ID: 87856
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
272 views
34 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 28 articles by views in atmospheric measurement techniques
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper presents a novel model, based on neural network techniques, to produce
short-term and local-specific forecasts of significant instability for flights in the terminal area of Galeão
Airport, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Twelve years of data were used for neural
network training/validation and test. Data are originally from four sources:
(1) hourly meteorological observations from surface meteorological stations
at five airports distributed around the study area; (2) atmospheric profiles
collected twice a day at the meteorological station at Galeão Airport;
(3) rain rate data collected from a network of 29 rain gauges in the study
area; and (4) lightning data regularly collected by national detection
networks. An investigation was undertaken regarding the capability of a
neural network to produce early warning signs – or as a nowcasting tool –
for significant instability events in the study area. The automated
nowcasting model was tested using results from five categorical statistics,
indicated in parentheses in forecasts of the first, second, and third hours,
respectively, namely proportion correct (0.99, 0.97, and 0.94), BIAS (1.10,
1.42, and 2.31), the probability of detection (0.79, 0.78, and 0.67),
false-alarm ratio (0.28, 0.45, and 0.73), and threat score (0.61, 0.47, and
0.25). Possible sources of error related to the test procedure are presented
and discussed. The test showed that the proposed model (or neural network)
can grab the physical content inside the data set, and its performance is
quite encouraging for the first and second hours to nowcast significant
instability events in the study area.
| Reference Key |
franca2016anatmospheric
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | França, G. B.;Almeida, M. V. de;Rosette, A. C.; |
| Journal | atmospheric measurement techniques |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.