Measuring posttraumatic growth and depreciation after spinal cord injury: A Rasch analysis.

Clicks: 353
ID: 84932
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in rehabilitation psychology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both positive (posttraumatic growth, PTG) and negative (posttraumatic depreciation, PTD) psychological changes following the injury. PTG and PTD were assessed using the 10-item short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-SF) and 10 matched negatively worded items for PTD (selected from the PTGI-42) within the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI). This item selection is henceforth called PTG/D-SF. The objective of this study was to test the metric properties of the PTG/D-SF to determine the best strategy to derive reliable sum scores and to test the validity of several different structural conceptualizations.Using cross-sectional data (N = 278), a series of unidimensional and multidimensional Rasch analyses of the PTG/D-SF (N = 20) were performed. Rasch analyses were conducted separately for the items or by domains to investigate dimensionality, monotonicity, item and model fit, and local item dependency of the instrument.The separate PTG and PTD items or their domains can be summated to form a unidimensional scale. Aggregation into domains improved the score distribution and increased the scope of the instruments. The reliability of the sum score for PTG was good (Person Separation: 0.81); the one for PTD was admissible (Person Separation: 0.77).PTG and PTD should be understood as distinct constructs rather than two ends of a continuum. Findings support the use of a PTG total score and to some degree the PTD total score. Future work could adapt the PTD items to improve the performance of the scale. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Reference Key
kunz2019measuringrehabilitation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kunz, Simon;Fellinghauer, Carolina;Peter, Claudio;
Journal rehabilitation psychology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1037/rep0000288
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.