Transitioning the Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Project Defense to Large Venue Poster Sessions.

Clicks: 369
ID: 80959
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #9 of 18 articles by views in The Journal of nursing education

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Accelerated growth in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs has mandated the need for innovative strategies for doctoral students to defend their final scholarly work while protecting the integrity and rigor of the experience.A poster defense strategy was implemented and evaluated via a faculty focus group and a Likert-scale survey. Sessions highlighting eight projects each were scheduled at 75-minute intervals allowing for both informal poster viewing and formal audience questioning facilitated by a moderator. Evaluation of the event trended positive, with focus group members celebrating the energy around each session, noting the significant increase in audience size compared to past podium defenses.Evaluators who attended previous DNP project defenses all indicated that the large venue poster session approach was just as or more effective than previous methods. [J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(1):51-53.].
Reference Key
griffin2020transitioningthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Griffin, Valerie;Griffin, Andrew;Stein, Kevin;Gray, Juliet Kerico;
Journal The Journal of nursing education
Year 2020
DOI
10.3928/01484834-20191223-12
URL
Keywords
cost-effectiveness congenital heart disease prenatal screening fetal cardiac anomalies fetal echocardiography

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.