Assessing the Risk of Stress in Organizations: Getting the Measure of Organizational-Level Stressors.
Clicks: 220
ID: 79323
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.2
/100
220 views
176 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #366 of 510 articles by views in Frontiers in psychology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 510 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Great Britain's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the Management Standards Indicator Tool to help organizations to assess and monitor organizational risks of work-related stress through surveying employees about the psychosocial risks for stress in their jobs. The use of employee-level data for deriving an organizational-level measure of psychosocial risks assumes that the constructs have equivalent meanings at different levels. However, this isomorphic condition has never been tested and this study fills this gap. Using data collected by the Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL) from 66,188 employees nested in 775 organizations, we demonstrate that the organizational-level measure representing the seven dimensions of the Management Standards Indicator Tool is equivalent, though not identical, to the individual-level measure. This implies that the organizational level is not a mirror of the aggregation of the individual level, and that the risk of work-related stress in an organization may derive not simply from bottom-up processes, but may be generated by top-down influences (e.g., organizational policies). Interventions may then be meaningfully targeted at the organizational level in the expectation that they will reduce the risk of work-related stress among the entire workforce, the valid measurement of which can be performed through the HSE's Management Standards Indicator Tool.
| Reference Key |
wood2019assessingfrontiers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Wood, Stephen;Ghezzi, Valerio;Barbaranelli, Claudio;Di Tecco, Cristina;Fida, Roberta;Farnese, Maria Luisa;Ronchetti, Matteo;Iavicoli, Sergio; |
| Journal | Frontiers in psychology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02776
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.