A convolutional route to abbreviation disambiguation in clinical text.
Clicks: 275
ID: 78445
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
275 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #23 of 30 articles by views in journal of biomedical informatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abbreviations sense disambiguation is a special case of word sense disambiguation. Machine learning methods based on neural networks showed promising results for word sense disambiguation (Festag and Spreckelsen, 2017) [1] and, here we assess their effectiveness for abbreviation sense disambiguation.Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were trained, one for each abbreviation, to disambiguate abbreviation senses. A reverse substitution (of long forms with short forms) method from a previous study was used on clinical narratives from Cleveland Clinic, USA, to auto-generate training data. Accuracy of the CNN and traditional Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were studied using: (a) 5-fold cross validation on the auto-generated training data; (b) a manually created, set-aside gold standard; and (c) 10-fold cross validation on a publicly available dataset from a previous study.CNN improved accuracy by 1-4 percentage points on all the three datasets compared to SVM, and the improvement was the most for the set-aside dataset. The improvement was statistically significant at p < 0.05 on the auto-generated dataset. We found that for some common abbreviations, sense distributions mismatch between the test and auto generated training data, and mitigating the mismatch significantly improved the model accuracy.The neural network models work well in disambiguating abbreviations in clinical narratives, and they are robust across datasets. This avoids feature-engineering for each dataset. Coupled with an enhanced auto-training data generation, neural networks can simplify development of a practical abbreviation disambiguation system.
| Reference Key |
joopudi2018ajournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Joopudi, Venkata;Dandala, Bharath;Devarakonda, Murthy; |
| Journal | journal of biomedical informatics |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
S1532-0464(18)30155-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.