A Comparative Study of Land Cover Classification by Using Multispectral and Texture Data.

Clicks: 343
ID: 68067
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #39 of 269 articles by views in BioMed research international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 269 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to find out the importance of machine vision approach for the classification of five types of land cover data such as bare land, desert rangeland, green pasture, fertile cultivated land, and Sutlej river land. A novel spectra-statistical framework is designed to classify the subjective land cover data types accurately. Multispectral data of these land covers were acquired by using a handheld device named multispectral radiometer in the form of five spectral bands (blue, green, red, near infrared, and shortwave infrared) while texture data were acquired with a digital camera by the transformation of acquired images into 229 texture features for each image. The most discriminant 30 features of each image were obtained by integrating the three statistical features selection techniques such as Fisher, Probability of Error plus Average Correlation, and Mutual Information (F + PA + MI). Selected texture data clustering was verified by nonlinear discriminant analysis while linear discriminant analysis approach was applied for multispectral data. For classification, the texture and multispectral data were deployed to artificial neural network (ANN: n-class). By implementing a cross validation method (80-20), we received an accuracy of 91.332% for texture data and 96.40% for multispectral data, respectively.
Reference Key
qadri2016abiomed Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Qadri, Salman;Khan, Dost Muhammad;Ahmad, Farooq;Qadri, Syed Furqan;Babar, Masroor Ellahi;Shahid, Muhammad;Ul-Rehman, Muzammil;Razzaq, Abdul;Shah Muhammad, Syed;Fahad, Muhammad;Ahmad, Sarfraz;Pervez, Muhammad Tariq;Naveed, Nasir;Aslam, Naeem;Jamil, Mutiullah;Rehmani, Ejaz Ahmad;Ahmad, Nazir;Akhtar Khan, Naeem;
Journal BioMed research international
Year 2016
DOI
10.1155/2016/8797438
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.