Polish consumer categorisation of grilled beef at 6 mm and 25 mm thickness into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
Clicks: 226
ID: 64513
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
62.2
/100
226 views
178 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #37 of 91 articles by views in Meat science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Meat Standards Australia (MSA) methodology was used to evaluate the sensory categorization of beef by Polish consumers. A significant quality range was created by utilisation of 3 muscles, M. psoas major, M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum, and M. semimembranosus from 22 divergent bull carcasses (Holstein-Friesian crosses with Limousine, Hereford). Consumers evaluated every sample for selected sensory traits and chose a grade. A trend was observed for 6 mm preparation to reduce the proportion of unsatisfactory SM, with a consequent increase in 3star counts, in contrast to reducing the proportion of PM 5star and LTL 4star with an increase in the lower categories. Within each thickness Polish consumers clearly distinguished between grades, defined by MQ4 (Meat Quality, 4 variables) boundaries derived from discriminant analysis. Similar accuracy was achieved for both thicknesses. It was concluded that the MQ4 score could be successfully used to support a meat quality grading system in Poland.
| Reference Key |
pogorzelski2019polishmeat
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pogorzelski, Grzegorz;Woźniak, Katarzyna;Polkinghorne, Rod;Półtorak, Andrzej;Wierzbicka, Agnieszka; |
| Journal | Meat science |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0309-1740(18)31156-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.