Safety and feasibility of antibiotic de-escalation in bacteremic pneumonia
Clicks: 223
ID: 6385
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.0
/100
223 views
181 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1,485 of 1,693 articles by views in Infection and drug resistance
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,693 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Safety and feasibility of antibiotic de-escalation in bacteremic pneumonia Faisal A Khasawneh,1 Adnanul Karim,2 Tashfeen Mahmood,3 Subhan Ahmed,4 Sayyed F Jaffri,3 Mansoor Mehmood2 1Section of Infectious Diseases, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Deaconess Hospital, Evansville, IN, 4Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA Background: Antibiotic de-escalation is a potential strategy advocated to conserve the effectiveness of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of antibiotic de-escalation in patients admitted with bacteremic pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was done for patients with bacteremic pneumonia admitted to Northwest Texas Hospital in Amarillo, TX, USA, during 2008. Antibiotic de-escalation was defined as changing the empiric antibiotic regimen to a culture-directed single agent with a narrower spectrum than the original regimen. Results: Sixty-eight patients were admitted with bacteremic pneumonia. Eight patients were not eligible for de-escalation. Among the 60 patients who were eligible for de-escalation, the treating physicians failed to de-escalate antibiotics in 27 cases (45.0%). Discharge to a long-term care facility predicted failure to de-escalate antibiotics, while an infectious diseases consultation was significantly associated with antibiotic de-escalation. The average daily cost of antibacterial therapy in the de-escalation group was $25.7 compared with $61.6 in the group where de-escalation was not implemented. The difference in mean length of hospital stay and mortality between the two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Antibiotic de-escalation is a safe management strategy but unfortunately is not widely adopted. Although bacterial resistance poses a significant threat and is rising, antimicrobial de-escalation has emerged as a potential intervention that can conserve the effectiveness of broad-spectrum antibiotics without compromising the patient's outcome. This practice is becoming important in the face of slow development of new anti-infective agents. Keywords: bacteremia, antibiotic de-escalation strategy, lung infection
| Reference Key |
faisal2014safetyinfection
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Faisal A Khasawneh;Adnanul Karim;Tashfeen Mahmood;Subhan Ahmed;Sayyed F Jaffri;Mansoor Mehmood and |
| Journal | Infection and drug resistance |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2147/IDR.S65928
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.