Building a professional global disaster response team at an academic health-care institution: the professionalisation of humanitarian health-care workers

Clicks: 301
ID: 61765
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #20 of 27 articles by views in the lancet global health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: The numbers of individuals affected by disasters and conflict are on the rise, similarly are the numbers of clinicans who seek to help. Although health-care workers want to provide immediate clinical care—as in field hospitals—disaster response requires a comprehensive set of knowledge, skills, and behaviour not taught in medical and nursing schools. With competency-based training and a vetted and credentialed workforce, academic medical institutions have the opportunity to augment emergency response for humanitiarian aid organisations. We aim to describe the minimum standards for building a professional disaster response team within an academic medical institution. Methods: Through literature review and key informant interviews, we built a database to describe emergency response experience in 21 countries within 25 national and international aid organisations, governments, and academic universities. We created a checklist and applied this to responses for sudden onset and chronic crises. Key variables included deployment parameters, credentialing procedures, competency or skillset requirements, predeployment and postdeployment preparation, and types of organisational support. Findings: We found large variation between organisations for emergency response, including the credentialling process, definition of competency or skillsets, implementation of deployment, and the extent of organisational support. From this analysis, we created a set of minimum standards for deployment, including physical and mental fitness, previous professional experience, team-based response, appropriate flexible skillset, approval or vetting by direct supervisors, initial or duration of availability, cultural or language competency, self reliance in austere conditions, communication skills, briefing and debriefing participation, and support from organisation. Interpretation: Minimum standards and guidelines for institutions deploying health-care workers to disasters is a key step in professionalisation. Funding: None.
Reference Key
cranmer2014buildinglancet Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cranmer, H;Aschkenasay, M;
Journal the lancet global health
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.