Detection of Mycobacterium lepromatosis in patients with leprosy in India [Retraction]

Clicks: 252
ID: 5976
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #1,231 of 1,693 articles by views in Infection and drug resistance

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,693 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Detection of Mycobacterium lepromatosis in patients with leprosy in India [Retraction] The Editor-in-chief and Publisher of the Infection and Drug Resistance wishes to retract the published article. Concerns were raised about the data presented in the published article and a review was initiated. The review highlighted some potential issues relating to misinterpretation of results which led to the incorrect conclusions about the identity of Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Each of the four 16S rRNA sequences described in the study were supplied by the authors and reanalysed. None of the four sequences returned the highest match with M. lepromatosis and one sequence, CH4, returned a positive match for Corynebacterium casei. It was also observed that the three M. lepromatosis 16S rRNA sequences obtained from GenBank (EU203590, GQ900372, GQ900374) were homologous and shared the same phylogeny. However, this was not indicated in the article. Each of the three hemN sequences described in the study were also supplied by the authors and reanalyzed. None of the sequences returned the highest match with M. lepromatosis and two of the sequences (CH7 and CPH570) returned a close match with human DNA suggesting possible contamination of either the tissue sample or PCR reaction. The authors were asked to provide an explanation for these findings but were unable to provide a satisfactory response. It was therefore determined the findings and conclusions presented in the article were not supported. This retraction relates to this paper
Reference Key
madhvi2018detectioninfection Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Madhvi Ahuja;Mallika Lavania;Itu Singh;Ravindra P Turankar;Seema Chhabra;Tarun Narang;Sunil Dogra;Utpal Sengupta and
Journal Infection and drug resistance
Year 2018
DOI
10.2147/IDR.S198258
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.