[Why are recommendations on the study of ejaculate not updated?]
Clicks: 347
ID: 49742
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
347 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 9 articles by views in urologiia (moscow, russia : 1999)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In recent years, the quality of germinal cells has been recognized as the main factor determining reproductive potential. Standard sperm analysis is of limited value for predicting both the achievement of a pregnancy and the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies, which raises the question of the additional significance of functional testing. Most current guidelines recommend to perform additional studies from a scientific point of view, recognizing their importance, but dont include men in the basic diagnostic schemes. In this review, we try to discuss of the relevance of special sperm testing.
| Reference Key |
efremov2019whyurologiia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Efremov, E A;Kasatonova, E V;Melnik, Ya I;Nikushina, A A; |
| Journal | urologiia (moscow, russia : 1999) |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.