Writing for publication- implications of text recycling and cut and paste writing.
Clicks: 242
ID: 46455
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.8
/100
240 views
193 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Increased use and availability of electronic text matching software (such as ithenticate ) to screen submissions to peer reviewed journals, means that Editors are increasingly being made aware of potential cases of plagiarism (Debnath 2016). While there are no true figures for academic plagiarism within submissions to peer-reviewed journals (Gasparyan et al 2017), anecdotally upwards of 25% of all submissions require some level of follow up and investigation. The text matching details provided by software such as ithenticate supports Editor decision-making, and assists Editors to explore all incidences of text matching fully.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (88 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
timmins2019writingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Timmins, Fiona; |
| Journal | journal of nursing management |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/jonm.12868
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.