Open Versus Robotic Cystectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Comparing Survival Outcomes.
Clicks: 411
ID: 45316
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.5
/100
411 views
283 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #26 of 253 articles by views in journal of clinical medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 253 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To assess the differential effect of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) on survival outcomes in matched analyses performed on a large multicentric cohort.The study included 9757 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) treated in a consecutive manner at each of 25 institutions. All patients underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching 2:1 was performed with two ORC patients matched to one RARC patient. The propensity-matched cohort included 1374 patients. Multivariable competing risk analyses accounting for death of other causes, tested association of surgical technique with recurrence and cancer specific mortality (CSM), before and after propensity score matching.Overall, 767 (7.8%) patients underwent RARC and 8990 (92.2%) ORC. The median follow-up before and after propensity matching was 81 and 102 months, respectively. In the overall population, the 3-year recurrence rates and CSM were 37% vs. 26% and 34% vs. 24% for ORC vs. RARC (all values > 0.1), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, RARC and ORC had similar recurrence and CSM rates before and after matching (all values > 0.1).Patients treated with RARC and ORC have similar survival outcomes. This data is helpful in consulting patients until long term survival outcomes of level one evidence is available.
| Reference Key |
moschini2019openjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Moschini, Marco;Zamboni, Stefania;Soria, Francesco;Mathieu, Romain;Xylinas, Evanguelos;Tan, Wei Shen;Kelly, John D;Simone, Giuseppe;Meraney, Anoop;Krishna, Suprita;Konety, Badrinath;Mattei, Agostino;Baumeister, Philipp;Mordasini, Livio;Montorsi, Francesco;Briganti, Alberto;Gallina, Andrea;Stabile, Armando;Sanchez-Salas, Rafael;Cathelineau, Xavier;Rink, Michael;Necchi, Andrea;Karakiewicz, Pierre I;Rouprêt, Morgan;Koupparis, Anthony;Kassouf, Wassim;Scherr, Douglas S;Ploussard, Guillaume;Boorjian, Stephen A;Lotan, Yair;Sooriakumaran, Prasanna;Shariat, Shahrokh F; |
| Journal | journal of clinical medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
E1192
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.