Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods.

Clicks: 234
ID: 42843
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
To measure nursing Workload (WL) of nurses who work in the Inpatient Unit, as recommended by the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), comparing observational and online methods to propose supervision strategies for academic professionals.Quantitative, descriptive, observational study performed in a Clinical/Surgical Hospital Unit. 30 direct and indirect activities. Data collected in observational and online records. Statistical analysis: SPSS 18.0 software, percentage frequencies and associated times between groups by Fisher's Exact test, 95% confidence interval, significance level 5%.Comparing the activities performed with the NIC time: from the direct 16, five observational and five online, were out of range, with no significant difference between frequencies (P=0.427). Of the 14 indirect, only in the observational, two were out of the range, without significant difference (P=0.486).Both methods measure WL; the online method developed accompanies activities performed in real time.
Reference Key
somensiworkloadrevista Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Somensi, Rute Merlo;Caregnato, Rita Catalina Aquino;Cervi, Gustavo Henrique;Flores, Cecilia Dias;
Journal revista brasileira de enfermagem
Year Year not found
DOI
S0034-71672018000401850
URL
Keywords
japanese early bilingual children mandarin stop accuracy stop consonants substitution patterns

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.