Adverse Drug Event Reporting Rates After the Implementation of an EHR Integrated Reporting System.

Clicks: 177
ID: 41943
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #138 of 170 articles by views in Studies in health technology and informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Under-reporting of adverse drug events (ADEs) is a common issue across healthcare systems, and lack of integration with clinical workflow and systems are among the leading causes of this problem. We sought to describe the development of an ADEs reporting system within an EHR that represents user needs and captures relevant data. We compared periods before and after the implementation, and describe the corresponding reporting rates.
Reference Key
correa2019adversestudies Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Correa, Eunice;Jauregui, Oscar Ignacio;Frangella, Julia;Peuchot, Verónica;Otero, Carlos;Luna, Daniel;
Journal Studies in health technology and informatics
Year 2019
DOI
10.3233/SHTI190580
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.