Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review.

Clicks: 250
ID: 37308
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #85 of 231 articles by views in Disability and rehabilitation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 231 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) can provide an option for the delivery of intensive aphasia rehabilitation but the users' views (i.e., People with Aphasia) must be considered to ensure satisfaction, motivation and adherence with this mode of rehabilitation. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical overview of studies where feedback was elicited from participants about their experiences with ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. A systematic search using six electronic databases was conducted in July 2015 and updated in May 2019. Studies of synchronous telerehabilitation and interventions targeting compensatory strategies were excluded from the review. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility and information was extracted on the characteristics of each study, methods of data collection and study outcomes. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria including studies with quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods research designs. The studies employed a variety of data collection methods, examining a number of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation activities and the findings investigated aspects of feasibility, usability and acceptance of this mode of rehabilitation. The findings indicate ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation is considered an acceptable mode of rehabilitation by people with aphasia who reported generally positive feedback, though variation among personal perspectives and experience is noted. There is currently no consensus measure of self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation may provide an acceptable mode of rehabilitation for people with aphasia. Exploring self-reported feedback from people with aphasia engaging in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation will provide insights into their experiences of this mode of rehabilitation. This information may help to guide clinicians when collaboratively planning and monitoring ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. Currently there is no consensus measure of self-reported feedback for people with aphasia engaging in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation.
Reference Key
kearns2019selfreporteddisability Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kearns, Áine;Kelly, Helen;Pitt, Ian;
Journal Disability and rehabilitation
Year 2019
DOI
10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.