Mental Workload Relating Health Information System - A Literature Review.

Clicks: 243
ID: 35829
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #92 of 170 articles by views in Studies in health technology and informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Assessing Mental Workload related to Health Information Systems can help to analyze weak points of the use of Health Information Systems and in health care work processes. Our objectives were to give an overview of current research and applied measurement methods as well as gaining insights into influencing factors of mental workload on the use of health information systems and vice versa.We applied a structured literature research by searching for "mental workload" on PubMed. Studies were included into our review if they assessed related to Health Information Systems.The research in PubMed led to 124 articles, resulting in 17 papers taken into in-depth analyses. We identified three categories referring to different study design types. Additionally, articles showed that mental workload was influenced by using health information systems and vice versa.The review was limited to only one database but revealed that future research with sociotechnical focus including mental workload is necessary.In contrast to the high relevance only a few articles address mental workload in Health Information systems. The quality of the studies in terms of evidence and external validity appears to be largely in need of development and should be improved in ongoing research.
Reference Key
kremer2019mentalstudies Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kremer, Lisanne;Leeser, Lea;Breil, Bernhard;
Journal Studies in health technology and informatics
Year 2019
DOI
10.3233/SHTI190840
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.