Functional divergence of the repressors of photomorphogenesis SPA2 and SPA3 during Arabidopsis seedling deetiolation

Clicks: 9
ID: 338913
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #402 of 415 articles by views in Journal of experimental botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 415 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The COP1/SPA ubiquitin ligase is a key repressor of photomorphogenesis that is inactivated by photoreceptors to initiate light signalling. The four SPA proteins (SPA1-SPA4) confer functional specificity to COP1 during plant growth, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we used a domain-swap approach in transgenic seedlings to address the functional divergence of SPA2 and SPA3. We show that the respective N-terminal kinase domain determines the contrasting protein stabilities of SPA2 and SPA3 in light-grown seedlings. The instability of SPA2 correlates with a specific ability of the SPA2 N-terminal domain to bind phytochrome A in the light, suggesting that phytochrome A promotes the CUL4DET1/COP1-dependent degradation of SPA2 but not of SPA3. We uncover that the coiled-coiled and WD-repeat domains of SPA2 and SPA3 substantially differ in their activity in repression of photomorphogenesis, with those of SPA2 being more active repressors than those of SPA3. Thus, SPA2 combines a potent repressor activity with light-induced instability. We conclude that the evolution of SPA2 instability in response to light counterbalances its inherent strong repressor activity, thereby allowing seedling etiolation in darkness followed by rapid reduction in COP1/SPA activity through SPA2 degradation upon light-exposure as seedlings emerge from soil to initiate photosynthetic growth.
Reference Key
openalex_W7162133478 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of experimental botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jxb/erag477
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.