North Korea in International Politics

Clicks: 1
ID: 338793
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,906 of 2,007 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,007 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) occupies a paradoxical position in international politics, viewed as both militarily formidable and economically fragile due to chronic isolation and international sanctions. Emerging in 1948 under Soviet occupation following World War II and Japanese colonial rule, North Korea’s unique state system was solidified under Cold War divisions, decolonization, and the Korean War (1950–1953). After the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea was close to economic collapse, undergoing natural disasters, famine, and leadership transition after the founder Kim Il-sung’s death. The series of overlapping crises that unfolded in the 1990s—humanitarian disasters and nuclear brinkmanship—embedded North Korea as both dangerous and unstable in global security discourses. Since the 1990s, North Korea has been framed as both a “strong” and “weak” state, combining military “strengths”—most notably its nuclear and missile programs—with profound domestic “weaknesses,” including economic fragility and humanitarian crises. This duality is central to how the DPRK has been represented and problematized as dangerous and unstable in regional and global security discourse. However, seeing North Korea solely through the binary lens of “strengths” and “weaknesses” reproduces a realist and liberal worldview that emerged at the end of the Cold War, where the dominant practice of international politics revolves around state-centric security.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225290233 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sophie Yeonhee Kim, David Shim
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780197851456.003.0767
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197851456.003.0767
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.