Environmental Dimensions of the Ethics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Clicks: 1
ID: 338490
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,780 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter outlines the environmental dimensions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)—the phenomenon of microbes developing resistance to pharmaceuticals used for treating infections, their bioethical significance, and some of the most obvious new ethical complexities and challenges for bioethical research made visible by broadening the scope of the ethics of AMR. AMR is a massive systemic, global threat to public health and the effectiveness of health care. The ethics of AMR comprises ethical aspects of the phenomenon itself, understanding its significance for fundamental values, and proposed actions to manage AMR, often linked to the concept of “one health.” Most of this discussion has focused on rationalizing the use of antibiotics in human health care and farming. However, AMR has a sizeable environmental dimension that so far has mostly gone unnoticed by bioethics. This dimension comprises the role of the environment as a source for evolution of resistance as well as a transmission route, both spawned by the pollution of antibiotics and faecal matter from various sources. A bioethical analysis of AMR needs to take these dimensions into account, and doing so may potentially upset fundamental assumptions in both practical bioethics, health policy and their environmental counterparts.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225186650 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780197807262.003.0012
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.