Meet East Boston, Massachusetts

Clicks: 1
ID: 338477
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,774 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines East Boston, Massachusetts (“Eastie”) as a case study of how urban planning and environmental racism produce debility—the systematic endangerment of bodyminds—among predominantly Latinx residents. The authors write as two disabled women of color trained in bioethics, grounding scholarship in lived experience to ask a simple, urgent question: What happens to bodyminds when a neighborhood is planned without its people at the center? The authors argue that planning decisions around brownfields, highways, tunnels, and Logan Airport’s air and noise pollution enact what Puar terms “slow death” and limit civic participation. The chapter defines key concepts—bioethics, urban planning/design, bodymind, debility—while situating Eastie’s colonial past, demographic shifts, and current redevelopment under PLAN: East Boston. Drawing on public-health evidence, the authors trace links between environmental exposures and respiratory, neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, reproductive, sleep, and mental-health harms. It also foregrounds the care practices of disabled and debilitated communities as vital sources of knowledge that resist eugenic world-building and offer models for co-capacitation. The chapter contends that environmental bioethics must move beyond medicalized “fixes” toward place-based, justice-centered planning that expands collective capacities. East Boston’s story reveals the ethical stakes of urban development and the necessity of centering disabled cultures in imagining livable futures.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225174622 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780197807262.003.0016
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.