Conflict and the Impact of Collective Recognition

Clicks: 1
ID: 338445
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,754 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter presents a set of theoretical claims that explain how collective recognition shapes international organisations’ approaches towards contested statehood claims. I argue that the ease of engagement with claimants aligns with a hierarchy of recognition: engaging with those whose right to statehood is titularly recognised is generally more difficult than engaging with recognised states, but still easier than engaging with those met with non-recognition. Building on the typology of collective recognition, an explanatory typology is developed that links different collective recognition positions to four approaches international organisations adopt towards statehood claimants who are not generally recognised: opposition, inaction, engagement without recognition, and state-building. By integrating themes of collective recognition, conflict, and state-building, this study enhances our understanding of these processes and their interrelations. Finally, analysis highlights how variation in recognition might interplay with variation in other sovereignty-associated conditions, particularly the state-like capacity to rule territories and populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225126951 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780197906088.003.0004
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.