Symbolic Policy without Pay Transparency in Croatia

Clicks: 1
ID: 338427
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,736 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter explains how and why Croatia’s formal commitment to equal pay has yielded largely symbolic outcomes. It shows that an instrument-light framework—anchored in the Labour Act and Gender Equality Act but lacking pay-transparency tools—does not translate principles into practice. EU accession heightened attention and produced new provisions, yet social partners rarely inserted operational clauses into collective agreements; desk reviews found few equal-pay references and almost no actionable mechanisms. Through a Gender Equality Policy in Practice (GEPP) lens, outcomes are gender-neutral: the pay gap persists, gatekeeper repertoires remain unchanged, and societal salience is weak. The chapter argues that progress requires coupling rules with routines and capacity backed by a resourced Ombudsperson/Labor Inspectorate and social-partner toolkits and pilots in feminized sectors. Without this implementation architecture, Croatia risks treating the EU Pay Transparency Directive as another exercise in symbolic compliance rather than a lever for substantive change.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225112605 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780198972914.003.0013
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.