The Concept of Militant Democracy

Clicks: 1
ID: 338385
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,695 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter describes what ‘militant democracy’ is and discusses controversies surrounding its meaning. In the classic definition, attributed to Karl Loewenstein, militant democracy is the principle that permits democratic states to impose pre-emptive restrictions on basic rights and liberties in order to protect themselves from internal subversion. Yet, some scholars use a more expansive definition that stretches the concept to cover not only rights restrictions but any type of action that aims to defend democracy. The chapter pushes back against such trends and narrows the conception of militant democracy to a specific ideal type of democratic self-defence centred on exclusion, exceptions to regular rules, and the perception of the threat as extraordinary. At the same time, by contrasting a ‘principled account’ of militant democracy with the more conventional ‘legal’ account, it demonstrates that, understood as a normative framework, the concept has a much broader range of institutional applications. Militant democracy thus manifests itself not only in the legal domain—as a practice of rights restrictions—but also in the political and societal domains—as practices such as cordon sanitaire, media censoring, and social media deplatforming. With the help of the principled account of militant democracy, the chapter examines which initiatives qualify as militant democratic and why.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225083673 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anthoula Malkopoulou
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780191981241.003.0002
URL
https://academic.oup.com/book/63615/chapter/584344488/chapter-pdf/72746237/isbn-9780191981241-book-part-2.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.