Reimagining Climate Adaptation Through Traditional Knowledge

Clicks: 1
ID: 338353
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,684 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Climate adaptation increasingly recognizes the value of traditional ecological knowledge for strengthening resilience, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development. However, its integration into formal climate governance remains fragmented, and limited attention has been paid to the policy design processes that shape how diverse knowledge systems are recognized and used. This article examines how traditional ecological knowledge is recognized and integrated into climate adaptation policy in India by combining insights from policy design, epistemic governance, and James Scott’s concept of administrative legibility. Using qualitative document analysis of constitutional provisions, national policies, legislative frameworks, and institutional arrangements, alongside illustrative case studies of traditional ecological practices, the study develops and applies a six-dimensional analytical framework to evaluate the recognition and institutional incorporation of TEK within climate governance. The findings indicate that although India’s policy architecture increasingly acknowledges traditional knowledge, its effective incorporation into adaptation planning is constrained by epistemic hierarchies, fragmented institutional arrangements, limited community participation, weak inter-sectoral coordination, and inadequate support for community-led adaptation. The analysis further argues that traditional ecological knowledge should be understood as a dynamic and context-specific knowledge system that complements, rather than replaces, scientific expertise. The article contributes to policy design scholarship by demonstrating how institutional assumptions about legitimate knowledge shape climate governance. It proposes an inclusive policy design framework centred on epistemic pluralism, meaningful participatory, multi-level institutional coordination, and rights-based recognition. The framework also offers an analytical basis for examining the governance of traditional knowledge in climate adaptation beyond India.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225185806 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780198986201.003.0111
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.