(Neuro) Epigenetic Ecosickness and Plastic “Wounding” in Samanta Schweblin’s Fever Dream

Clicks: 1
ID: 338331
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,680 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Ecosickness, as theorized by Heather Houser, entangles somatic experience and environmental damage by revealing how the material reality of sickness erodes the boundary between body and environment. This framework anticipates insights from epigenetic research that uncovers how environmental triggers create lasting patterns of gene expression, or epigenetic signatures, within and on the body. Through a critical reading of Samanta Schweblin’s Fever Dream (2017), the study examines how epigenetic ecosickness emerges from environmental toxicity and situates its representations of bodily vulnerability within Catherine Malabou’s theoretical accounts of neuronal plasticity. It argues that this narrative reconfigures subjectivity through environmentally induced forms of trauma and anxiety, producing what Malabou conceptualizes as the “new wounded.” Although the novel does not depict clinical neurological disorders, the study identifies narrative fissures in which environmental degradation co-imbricates with affective disturbances, giving rise to permanent or temporary states of indifference or disaffection. It understands “destructive plasticity” as an ontological variant of plastic “wounding” animated by epigenetic ecosickness with reference to the novel. It examines how the toxic sublimity of the Argentine soy fields in Fever Dream produces a transcorporeal overlap with the “toxic latency” of inorganic matter and how neuroplasticity functions as an index of the body’s (in)adaptability to toxic environments. The study also reads the maternal figures as staging two distinct registers of maternal anxiety triggered under conditions of environmental exposure. The first operates as an epigenetically transmitted behavioral disposition, while the second emerges as a post-traumatic guilt, a retrospective rupture produced by witnessing the destructive-plastic effects of epigenetic transformation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225157711 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/9780198979616.003.0131
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.