Sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis–barriers and facilitators, a qualitative analysis

Clicks: 4
ID: 338022
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #75 of 143 articles by views in Rheumatology Advances in Practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 143 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Sedentary behaviour (SB) is a modifiable risk factor in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SB interventions may be more acceptable where pain, fatigue and fluctuating disease activity limit physical activity (PA). To inform the development of effective/scalable interventions, this study aimed to; (1) determine how people with RA conceptualise SB and (2) explore lived experiences of SB to identify barriers and facilitators. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with RA, recruited in the UK using opportunistic and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Participants (n = 14) used SB, activity, movement and PA/exercise interchangeably. Three themes were generated. Motivation explained engagement or breaks in SB; SB was reduced when movement was meaningful, enjoyable, or linked to valued roles. Anticipated effort and fear of pain reinforced SB. Resilience and adaptive strategies reduced SB, while competing demands reinforced SB. Movement, captured negotiation between activity and rest, shaped by physical symptoms, contextual factors, and sociocultural influences. The same factors (e.g., family) operated as a facilitator and barrier. Participants recognised that rest prevented exacerbations, however, prolonged sedentariness worsened stiffness and function. Identity in Flux, reflected changes in perceived capability, stigma and loss of identity reinforcing SB for some, while others reconstructed identity to maintain valued roles and social participation. Conclusion SB is shaped by psychological, social and contextual determinants, not symptoms alone. Interventions should adopt identity-sensitive, flexible approaches that enhance meaningful motivations and address pain-related fears, rather than relying on prescriptive targets.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224756723 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Florentia Kitas, Carolyn Anne Greig, Matthew Willett, Jet Veldhuijzen Zanten, Sally A. M. Fenton
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rap/rkag137
URL
https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/rap/rkag137/72616410/rkag137.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.