Convergent evolution of inflorescence-like units and syncephalia in Asteraceae

Clicks: 4
ID: 337817
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #266 of 266 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 266 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Capitula in Asteraceae are arranged in flowering shoot systems usually interpreted as compound inflorescences or synflorescences. If they form dense conglomerates, they are termed syncephalia likewise interpreted as inflorescences. However, ontogenetic evidence indicates that inflorescence-like patterns can also arise from flowering shoot systems and complex floral units. We here disentangle confusion surrounding the different organizational levels and explain convergent evolution in inflorescence-like units and syncephalia. METHODS: We examined meristem organization, developmental trajectories, and flowering sequences in the capitulum arrangement of 22 species representing seven tribes. Eight species were subject to further developmental investigations. The ontogenetic concept of inflorescence diversity was used as reference framework. KEY RESULTS: Matricaria dioscoidea, used as reference species, produces solitary capitula in branched flowering shoot systems. Three genera arrange capitula in inflorescence-like patterns proved to be flowering shoot systems (Liatris) or inflorescences (Ligularia, Achillea). Flowering sequences turned out to be a key character to distinguish flowering shoot systems from inflorescences. The remaining species had syncephalia with densely aggregated capitula arranged in inflorescences (9 sp.) and complex floral units (5 sp.). For the latter, we introduce the term caput to distinguish them from head aggregates. Three syncephalia could not be clearly interpreted without additional developmental data. Aggregation can be combined with a reduction in flower number per capitulum and the formation of a common receptacle. Pseudanthia formation, i.e. the reiteration of flower-like patterns known from capitula, mainly occurs through extrafloral bracts acting as attractive elements. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that both inflorescence-like units and syncephalia are convergent structures. Initiation and flowering sequences provide more reliable criteria for identifying the underlying morphology than branching patterns, which recur on different hierarchical levels. The formation of capita through repeated fractionation of a determinate meristem reveals a distinct evolutionary pathway beyond inflorescence aggregation driven by heterochrony.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224665988 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Regine Claßen‐Bockhoff, Jakub Baczyński, Jasmin Wahl, Dieter Langerbeins
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag338
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag338
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.