In Vivo and Imaginal Exposure: Ongoing Sessions

Clicks: 11
ID: 337750
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,584 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter describes the ongoing implementation of imaginal and in vivo exposure across approximately nine or more treatment sessions and outlines session structure, required materials, assessment procedures, collaborative weighing, and systematic homework review to monitor eating disorder fears and behaviors. It explains that repeated imaginal exposure strengthens inhibitory learning, reduces fear, and involves structured processing using Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS) data to consolidate learning and evaluate treatment progress, while exposures also function as assessment tools. The chapter also introduces the identification and focus on hot spots in imaginal exposures. Flexibility within fidelity when adapting exposure delivery or session quantity and guidance for tailoring treatment to individual client needs while maintaining core therapeutic mechanisms are emphasized. It addresses common clinical challenges, including low anxiety activation, cognitive avoidance, safety behaviors, and rumination, and clarifies conditions that optimize exposure effectiveness and explains how to identify progress. Finally, the chapter outlines homework expectations, including repeated imaginal exposure practice, in vivo exposure completion, and safety behavior reduction to work toward the client’s treatment goals.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224670329 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/med-psych/9780197816875.003.0008
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.