Genome-wide association study of eye muscle area and intramuscular fat in pure- and crossbred beef cattle

Clicks: 13
ID: 337610
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #525 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The genetic improvement of meat quality traits, such as eye muscle area (EMA) and intramuscular fat (IMF), is a primary goal for increasing the profitability and efficiency of the beef industry. However, it remains unclear how the genetic architecture of these traits differs across diverse breed types, which complicates the development of accurate multi-breed genomic evaluations. The objective of this study was to identify common genomic regions associated with ultrasound EMA and IMF across five beef cattle populations, including two purebreds (Angus and Hereford) and three crossbreds (Brangus, Santa Gertrudis, and Speckle Park). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed using a linear mixed model. Phenotypic and genomic data from 66,313 bulls and 56,200 heifers for EMA, and 65,230 bulls and 54,905 heifers for IMF, were analysed using medium-density SNP arrays. The results showed some associated genomic regions that were shared across breeds, likely due to their similar genetic origins or breeding objectives, for example: chromosome 2 at ∼0.57—14 Mb for both bull and heifer EMA and IMF in Santa Gertrudis and Speckle Park; chromosome 5 at positions ∼45—50 Mb for bull and heifer IMF in Brangus and Santa Gertrudis and for ∼105—106 for bull EMA in Angus and Hereford breeds; chromosome 7 at ∼90—91 Mb for bull EMA and heifer IMF in Angus and Hereford, chromosome 17 at ∼60—62 Mb for bull IMF in Angus and Hereford; and chromosome 20 at ∼4—5 Mb for heifer IMF in Angus and Hereford. Some genomic signals were breed-specific, likely reflecting differences in allele frequencies or linkage disequilibrium between pure- and crossbred populations. This research demonstrates that while some genetic drivers of meat quality are conserved across breeds, breed-specific markers are essential for accurate genomic prediction. These findings provide a biological basis for applying marker weighting in genomic evaluations to enhance selection accuracy for meat quality traits in multi-breed evaluations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224109240 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag340
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.