Divergent Responses of the Cyclades to Large Earthquakes: Insights from Amorgos Island

Clicks: 12
ID: 337559
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #316 of 338 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 338 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Summary On 9 July 1956, the southeastern Cyclades were struck by an earthquake doublet, consisting of an ∼Ms 7.4 mainshock, the largest recorded in Greece during the instrumental era, followed shortly afterward by a twin earthquake of magnitude greater than 6.0. The sequence caused severe damage on Santorini, leading Greek authorities to declare the island a disaster area, and triggered a major tsunami that affected much of the Aegean basin. Despite the historical significance of this catastrophe, ground-motion observations in the near-source region remain sparse and sometimes contradictory seventy years later, limiting our understanding of the rupture process and hindering reliable seismic hazard assessment. This is particularly true for Amorgos, located less than 30 km from the rupture zone, where available macroseismic evidence suggests unexpectedly low earthquake impacts. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted the first comprehensive geophysical investigation of Amorgos, combining passive and active seismic methods, including Ambient Vibration Arrays (AVAs) and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW). Taking advantage of the remarkable seismic sequence that occurred between Santorini and Amorgos in early 2025, we further compared the seismic responses of both islands to a set of local crustal earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 3.2. Our results provide a geophysical characterisation of the island’s main inhabited areas and reveal moderate to high near-surface shear- and compressional-wave velocities, consistent with the local geology and indicative of stiff soil conditions with limited amplification potential. Combined with the analysis of seismicity, these observations confirm the absence of site effects in Amorgos, in sharp contrast with the strong amplification and directivity observed in Santorini. Conversely, the permanent seismological station on Amorgos exhibits remarkably short-duration ground motions and a pronounced attenuation of high-frequency energy (> 6 Hz), corresponding to the frequency range of traditional Cycladic buildings. These findings offer a new perspective on the ground-motion pattern of the 1956 earthquake and suggest that the geological setting of Amorgos played a major role in mitigating earthquake impacts. However, the geophysical evidence does not account for the large spatial variability in the reported macroseismic intensities, raising questions about the reliability of the intensity assessments. More broadly, this study highlights the complexity of near-fault ground motions and demonstrates the relevance of integrated geophysical approaches for overcoming the limitations of macroseismic datasets and improving seismic hazard assessment.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224118784 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Andy Combey, E D Mercerat, V Kouskouna, P Langlaude, M Pernoud, N Sakellariou, N Galanos, F Leclerc
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag443
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag443
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.