Redesigning fibromyalgia care: insights from ethnographic case studies of UK services

Clicks: 4
ID: 337536
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #72 of 76 articles by views in Rheumatology Advances in Practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Fibromyalgia is associated with substantial burden for individuals and healthcare systems, yet care remains fragmented and inconsistent. Experiences of not being believed are common and contribute to delays in diagnosis, repeated consultations, and poor outcomes. There is limited evidence on how care should be organised and delivered. We sought to identify and characterise how those features of care valued by people with fibromyalgia are enacted across diverse UK services. Methods We conducted multi-site ethnographic case studies of services providing care for people with fibromyalgia across England, Scotland and Wales. Services were purposively sampled from various settings as identified through prior surveys, professional networks and stakeholder input. Data included observations, documentary analysis, and staff interviews, and were analysed thematically to identify shared features of care. Results 12 cases were studied, comprising approximately 200 hours of observation, 59 interviews and documentary analysis. Across diverse service models, common features included innovative approaches to multi-disciplinary team service delivery, underpinned by a holistic biopsychosocial ethos with a strong emphasis on validating patients’ experiences. Key aspects were relationship-based care, coaching to support self-management, continuity of care, opportunities for peer support. Validation appeared to enable engagement with care and support behaviour change. Conclusion These findings shift the focus from specific interventions to the organisation and delivery of care as key determinants of effective fibromyalgia management. By identifying how services can support validation, engagement and continuity, this work provides a practical foundation for co-designed principles of care to inform the development of more consistent, patient-centred services.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224098248 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Teresa M. D. Finlay, Rosemary J Hollick, Caroline Cupit, Catherine J. Pope, the PACFIND study team, Gareth Jones, Louise Locock, Gary John Macfarlane, Paul MacNamee, Kathryn Remmes Martin, Peter Murchie, Ernest Choy, Sue Ziébland, Karen E Walker-Bone, Chris Eccleston, David Williams, Neil Basu
Journal Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rap/rkag136
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.