Making Sense of Clinical Laboratory Results: An Analysis of Questions and Replies in a Social Q&A Community.

Clicks: 191
ID: 33713
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #122 of 170 articles by views in Studies in health technology and informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Previous literature has revealed that patients have difficulty making sense of their clinical data. To address this barrier, we first need to understand what kinds of support that patients may seek. In this study, we analyzed question posts and their replies in a social Q&A community to understand what types of support people are providing to and receiving from the community and what contextual information they provide in order to elicit relevant answers.
Reference Key
zhang2019makingstudies Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zhang, Zhan;Lu, Yu;Wilson, Caleb;He, Zhe;
Journal Studies in health technology and informatics
Year 2019
DOI
10.3233/SHTI190759
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.