Structural homeostasis, functional coordination, and spontaneous ovulation in the Giant panda during the periovulatory period

Clicks: 10
ID: 334156
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #180 of 186 articles by views in biology of reproduction

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 186 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The periovulatory period is the most critical window for successful conception in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca); however, the in vivo structural dynamics of the reproductive tract during this phase-specifically, the temporal patterns of endometrial thickness, ovarian volume, and follicular development relative to the estrogen peak-remain poorly characterized. To address this gap, this study combined noninvasive endocrine monitoring from 23 adult females across five breeding seasons (2021–2025). We demonstrate this period is defined not by linear, hormone-driven morphological changes but by four key features: (i) Structural homeostasis: The endometrial thickness and ovarian volume remained stable across the −10 to 66-hour window relative to the estrogen peak, with no significant linear association with time or concurrent hormone levels. (ii) Spontaneous ovulation: Direct laparoscopic evidence from one individual confirmed ovulation at ~48 hours post-peak without mating stimulation. (iii) Coordinated follicular development: A positive trend between the follicle count and size heterogeneity challenges the conventional resource competition model. (iv) Primacy of interindividual variation: Time phase accounted for only 9.0% of the variance in follicle number (η2 = 0.090), with the remaining 91.0% attributable to other sources of variation, including interindividual differences. This substantial unexplained variance, combined with large absolute differences among individuals at similar time points, indicates that interindividual variation is a major source of phenotypic variance. These findings shift the focus from a linear, hormone-centric model to an integrative framework grounded in individual biological identity, providing a basis for precision conservation breeding tailored to each female’s unique reproductive phenotype.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223651293 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bo Luo, Xiangqian Meng, Bo Yang, Xingyu Lv, Liu Yang, Ping Lei, Ming He, Xiangying Huang, Guiquan Zhang, Dongmei Ge, Meiling Cheng, Wei Yan, Yanwu Lai, Yaling Huang, Wen Zeng, Tian Li, Yingmin Zhou, Penghao Li
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal biology of reproduction
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/biolre/ioag175
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioag175
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.