A Quality Improvement Initiative in Hospital-Based Speech-Language Pathology: Development and Evaluation of a Lean–Agile Management Model

Clicks: 11
ID: 333689
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #158 of 164 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 164 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Hospital-based Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) plays a strategic role in the care of critically ill patients, particularly in dysphagia management. However, high service demand and limited resources highlight the need for structured management approaches. This quality improvement (QI) study describes the implementation of a Lean–Agile management model and the establishment of a baseline of clinical care indicators to support dysphagia management in a high-complexity hospital setting. Methods This quality improvement initiative used a retrospective descriptive design and was conducted in a high-complexity quaternary public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. The model comprised four phases: process mapping and value chain construction; clinical demand management using a Kanban-inspired prioritisation system; continuous monitoring through predefined process and outcome indicators; and evaluation through retrospective analysis of 1,312 adult ICU patients receiving dysphagia management between January 2024 and June 2025. Oral intake status was classified using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Descriptive statistics were used, and proportions are reported with 95% confidence intervals (Wilson method). Results The mean daily service coverage rate was 73%, corresponding to 33 patients seen per day out of a mean daily active demand of 45 patients across 100 ICU beds. The overall prevalence of dysphagia (FOIS 1–5) was 88.95% (95%CI: 87.1–90.5%), and dependence on an alternative feeding route at initial assessment (FOIS 1–3) was observed in 54.65% (95%CI: 51.9–57.3%) of patients. The favourable swallowing outcome rate was 80.55% (95%CI: 77.8–83.0%; N = 869), and the alternative feeding route weaning rate was 77.28% (95%CI: 73.4–80.8%; N = 493). Unfavourable outcomes were predominantly attributable to poor functional prognosis (52.05%) and clinical severity (30.41%), whereas process-related failures accounted for only 0.5% of the total sample. Conclusion The Lean–Agile management model provided a structured approach to organising SLP services in a high-complexity ICU setting and enabled the establishment of a baseline of dysphagia care indicators. Most unfavourable outcomes were attributable to patients' underlying clinical conditions rather than service-related factors. These findings may inform service planning and quality monitoring in similar hospital contexts, pending multicentre evaluation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223367241 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Carina Escudero, Cirley Novais Valente, Gisele Chagas de Medeiros, Fernanda Chiarion Sassi, Ana Paula Ritto, Cláudia Regina Furquim de Andrade
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzag104
URL
https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzag104/72405860/mzag104.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.