Orthodontists' Awareness and Screening Practices for Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A National Survey in Australia

Clicks: 11
ID: 333622
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #235 of 243 articles by views in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 243 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Study Objectives The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey awareness, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding the screening of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) among orthodontists in Australia. Methods A pilot-tested electronic survey was distributed to 485 full members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Questions were related to demographics, screening methods, perceived barriers, and attitudes toward education and interdisciplinary collaboration. Results were summarised using item-specific denominators, with multiple-response percentages based on the number of respondents answering each item. Results The analysable response rate was 31.8% (154/485). Most participants (139/154, 90.3%) practiced primarily in private settings and in urban or suburban areas (138/154, 89.6%). Only a small proportion (25.2%) reported routine SDB screening, while 45.0% screened only in selected cases. Among respondents answering the screening-method questions, informal questions (83/104, 79.8%) and clinical examination (64/104, 61.5%) were most common. The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire and STOP-Bang Questionnaire were used by 25/104 (24.0%) and 22/104 (21.2%), respectively. The main barriers to routine screening were insufficient training, lack of standardized screening protocols, and limited collaboration with medical professionals. Most respondents supported continuing professional development training (102/146, 69.9%) and inclusion of SDB teaching in the Doctor of Clinical Dentistry curriculum (127/146, 87.0%). Conclusions Among Australian orthodontists, routine SDB screening was limited and predominantly informal. In the Australian setting, professional bodies and orthodontic training programs should prioritise validated screening protocols, education, and clear interdisciplinary referral pathways.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223389887 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tassneem H Elagib, Marie A. Cornelis, A Gikas, Maurice J. Meade, Paolo M. Cattaneo
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/sleep/zsag281
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag281
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.