To buzz or to sip: Asymmetric pollination effectiveness hints at the evolutionary transition of floral rewards

Clicks: 12
ID: 333323
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #261 of 269 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 269 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Evolutionary transitions between floral reward types, such as the repeated loss of nectar, are common across angiosperms, yet the ecological mechanisms driving these shifts remain poorly understood. In Pedicularis, the evolutionary loss of nectar is hypothesized to be associated with shifts to buzz pollination. However, empirical comparisons of pollination effectiveness between nectar- and pollen-foraging behaviours within a single transitional system are largely lacking. Methods We investigated Pedicularis alaschanica and its principal pollinator, Bombus friseanus, in the Hengduan Mountains. This plant represents a transitional evolutionary state, as it possesses a beak for specialized pollen delivery but still secretes copious nectar. This novel and unique system allows for a direct comparison of two distinct intraspecific foraging behaviours performed by the same bee species: upright nectar feeding (dorsal contact) versus vibratile pollen collection (ventral contact/buzz pollination). We quantified floral traits, nectar dynamics, single-visit pollen removal and deposition, and assessed the plant's breeding system and natural pollen limitation. Key Results We confirmed and quantified the nectar properties of this transitional species, revealing distinct nectar secretion dynamics. While single-visit pollen removal did not differ significantly between the two foraging behaviours, buzz-pollinating visits were significantly more time-efficient and deposited on average more than twice as many pollen grains on stigmas compared to nectar-foraging visits. Breeding system experiments revealed that P. alaschanica is a partially self-incompatible outcrosser, and its natural seed set is not pollen-limited. Conclusions Our study revealed a marked functional asymmetry in pollen transfer driven by intraspecific behavioral variation among pollinators. In a non-pollen-limited system, the superior per-visit pollen deposition achieved by buzz-pollinating bees likely enhances male siring success. This high effectiveness likely relaxes the selective pressure to maintain metabolically costly nectar. Our findings provide a compelling mechanistic explanation for the repeated evolutionary loss of floral nectar.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223171913 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag337
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.