Doing Something in Political Psychology

Clicks: 10
ID: 333150
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,581 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter follows John Jost’s personal and intellectual journey into political psychology, tracing how early family influences and academic mentors led him to integrate psychological theory with political activism. He discovers in social psychology a framework for connecting individual motivation to societal structures, ultimately developing system justification theory, which explains why people, including members of disadvantaged groups, often rationalize and defend the status quo. His second major contribution pertains to “elective affinities” and the psychology of political orientation. Jost draws from diverse thinkers to argue that belief systems reflect psychological needs to manage uncertainty, threat, and social belonging, which shape left-right ideological preferences. Through extensive empirical research, he demonstrates how ideological orientations correlate with neurocognitive styles, emotional needs, personality traits, and sociopolitical attitudes across cultures and contexts. Finally, the chapter affirms the power of theory and collaboration in advancing scientific knowledge, emphasizing Jost’s lifelong commitment to using political psychology to understand and challenge inequality and illegitimate aspects of institutional power.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223087498 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197771051.003.0014
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.