Authoritarian Propaganda

Clicks: 17
ID: 333105
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #894 of 1,650 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,650 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Studies of propaganda in authoritarian regimes have multiplied rapidly over the past two decades, generating several important developments. This chapter reviews and synthesizes recent scholarship, organizing it around four analytically distinct frameworks through which propaganda exercises political influence: (1) persuasion; (2) signaling; (3) collective influence; and (4) upward messaging. The chapter then proposes a new definition of propaganda that goes beyond the traditional persuasion-centric understanding to incorporate a range of non-persuasive functions that propaganda serves, the various audiences it targets, and the orders of belief it shapes. It concludes by identifying major gaps and outlining promising directions for future research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223064931 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871996.013.0065
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.