Species-specific budburst responses to diurnal temperature cycles during chilling and forcing in temperate deciduous trees

Clicks: 1
ID: 332649
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #108 of 108 articles by views in Tree physiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Cold temperatures (‘chilling’) perceived by tree buds progressively release winter dormancy and initiate sensitivity to warmer temperatures (‘forcing’) required for budburst. Phenology of temperate trees may also respond to daylength, but it remains unclear whether chilling and forcing accumulation is linked to the diurnal cycle. Here, we tested whether chilling accumulation is influenced by light–dark cycle frequency, and whether forcing is more effective during daylight. We harvested twig cuttings from four temperate tree species (Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Quercus robur and Acer pseudoplatanus) with contrasting chilling and forcing requirements. In Experiment 1, twigs were harvested in November and exposed to 3°C under three light–dark cycle frequencies: 12h light/12h dark, 6h/6h, and 4h/4h (1, 2 or 3 cycles/day) for one or two months (short vs. long chilling). Twigs were then transferred to two forcing regimes with the same daily mean but different day/night temperatures (25°C/10°C and 20°C/15°C). In Experiment 2, twigs were harvested after substantial chilling and exposed to opposite day/night forcing regimes (25°C/10°C vs. 10°C/25°C). In Experiment 1, shorter light–dark cycles under long chilling delayed budburst in C. betulus, whereas effects on budburst success depended on chilling duration in C. betulus and Q. robur. Interestingly, budburst occurred significantly earlier at 25°C/10°C than at 20°C/15°C in all species, up to 12 days in F. sylvatica, suggesting more effective daytime forcing or non-linear forcing accumulation. Experiment 2 demonstrated that forcing was more effective during daylight, with 10%, 19% and 51% more degree days required for budburst under warm nights in Q. robur, C. betulus and F. sylvatica, respectively, but no difference in A. pseudoplatanus. Our study shows that light–temperature interactions and non-linear forcing responses can shape budburst timing, implying that tree phenological responses to warming may depend not only on its magnitude but also on its timing within the diurnal cycle.
Reference Key
openalex_W7222791960 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Yann Vitasse, Günter Hoch, Steeve Pépin, Francesco Giardina
Journal Tree physiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/treephys/tpag154
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpag154
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.