A Single-Number Value Metric Integrating Quality and Cost in Outpatient Physical Therapy

Clicks: 5
ID: 332402
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #101 of 103 articles by views in Physical Therapy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Importance As health care transitions toward value-based care, outpatient physical therapy lacks a practical metric that objectively integrates quality of care and cost into a single measure of clinical value. Objective The objective was to develop a single-number value metric (VM) integrating clinical effectiveness, patient experience, and cost efficiency in outpatient physical therapy and to determine its concordance with blinded manager assessments of therapist value. Design This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Setting The study was conducted at 8 outpatient physical therapy clinics within a single health care system, including freestanding ambulatory clinics and hospital-based outpatient departments. Participants The study included twelve licensed physical therapists and 2400 outpatient episodes of care. Intervention(s) or Exposure(s) Therapist-level patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) improvement, clinic-level Net Promoter Score (NPS), and financial data were combined to calculate a single-number VM. Blinded clinical managers independently ranked therapists according to perceived value. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) VM scores were calculated for each therapist. Concordance between VM rankings and blinded manager rankings was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results VM scores ranged from 1.39 to 4.76 (median = 2.39; interquartile range = 1.99–3.13). Across 2400 episodes of care, 72.8% of PROM changes met or exceeded published minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Among ambulatory therapists, VM rankings demonstrated a strong inverse correlation with manager rankings (Spearman ρ = −0.82). Among hospital-based therapists, VM rankings demonstrated perfect inverse agreement with manager rankings (Spearman ρ = −1.00). Conclusions The proposed VM integrates clinical effectiveness, patient experience, and cost efficiency into a feasible, single-number measure of value in outpatient physical therapy. VM scores were strongly aligned with blinded managerial assessments of therapist value. Relevance The VM offers a potential framework for evaluating clinical value in outpatient physical therapy and supporting the transition from volume-based to value-based care.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221835573 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bryan Bourcier, Thomas Ruediger, Christine Dailey Walck, Sean M. Kennedy
Journal Physical Therapy
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ptj/pzag109
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag109
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.