Detection Is Not Identifiability: An Observability Theory for Earthquake Source Inference from InSAR

Clicks: 15
ID: 332356
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #245 of 338 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 338 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Summary Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) provides spatially dense measurements of coseismic deformation, but detection of a deformation signal does not imply that its generating earthquake source is well constrained or that heterogeneous fault slip is spatially recoverable. This study develops an information-theoretic framework that separates three levels of earthquake-source inference: statistical detection, local source-parameter identifiability and finite-fault recoverability. Detection is quantified using a whitened known-template statistic; local identifiability is characterised through the eigenspectrum of a prior-scaled Fisher information matrix, from which an effective identifiable dimension, information gain and invariant weak-subspace diagnostics are derived; and finite-fault recoverability is quantified using a prior-conditioned slip-information operator and an effective recoverable slip dimension. Controlled elastic-dislocation experiments vary earthquake magnitude, centroid depth, fault dip, viewing geometry, spatial covariance, nuisance components, data loss, spatial sampling and complementary observations. To isolate fault geometry, the principal benchmarks use common strike, rake and rupture scaling and vary only dip between ${30}^ \circ $, ${55}^ \circ $ and ${85}^ \circ $. At 10 km centroid depth, the ${P}_{{\rm{det}}} = 0.5$ boundary precedes the illustrative ${d}_{{\rm{eff}}} = 5$ level by 0.600, 0.533 and 0.436 magnitude units for the three dips, respectively; this ordering persists wherever both transitions lie within the analysed magnitude–depth domain. Complementary line-of-sight geometries and additional geodetic observations increase information when they constrain source directions that remain weak in the existing data, whereas correlated noise, selective removal of informative observations and spatial decimation substantially reduce local identifiability. Finite-fault experiments show that numerical model dimension and information-supported dimensionality can diverge strongly: at 10 km depth, increasing the discretisation from 12 to 160 slip patches raises the prior-conditioned effective recoverable dimension only from 5.88 to 6.56, while at 20 km depth it changes from 2.86 to 2.94. The resulting magnitude–depth regime maps demonstrate that InSAR earthquake-source observability is task dependent: detection, local source identifiability and finite-fault recoverability quantify different properties of the same source–observation system and should therefore be evaluated separately.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221804356 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Antonino D'Alessandro
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag442
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag442
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.