Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Associated Facial Changes: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management

Clicks: 46
ID: 332347
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #27 of 129 articles by views in Aesthetic surgery journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Facial hollowing, skin laxity, and more prominent folds are increasingly reported during weight loss with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The term ‘Ozempic face’ can imply a drug-specific adverse effect, although similar changes occur after other forms of substantial weight loss. This review examines the clinical evidence, proposed mechanisms, and implications for aesthetic care. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for January 2014 through August 2026. Selection was reported using PRISMA 2020 where applicable, followed by narrative synthesis. Of 958 records, 46 reports were included. Serial imaging in 20 patients showed a median 9% reduction in midfacial volume, with greater loss in superficial than deep compartments (11% vs 7%). Regression estimated approximately 7% total midfacial volume loss per 10 kg lost. A FACE-Q short-form has been validated, and a survey of 1,226 participants found more reports of facial volume loss and laxity with greater percentage weight loss. Post-bariatric studies also describe facial deflation and increased apparent age, particularly in older patients and after larger losses. Current evidence favors weight-loss-associated deflation superimposed on baseline anatomy and aging. The independent effect of weight-loss rate and the modifying roles of menopause and hormone therapy remain uncertain. Aesthetic treatment evidence is limited and largely uncontrolled.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221790000 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Aesthetic surgery journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjag230
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.