Centered T-matrix method for pressure-dependent effective elastic moduli of rocks

Clicks: 14
ID: 332244
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #277 of 338 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 338 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Summary Effective elastic moduli govern seismic wave velocities in porous rocks and are widely used to interpret laboratory and field measurements. Predicting these moduli from microstructure remains difficult for rocks with high porosity, strong elastic contrast, anisotropic mineral fabrics, and connected pore space. We revisit the T-matrix approach and propose a centered formulation that cleanly separates the response of a chosen reference medium from the additional effects of heterogeneity and interactions. This reorganization yields a single framework that recovers several widely used closures as special cases, including a one-pass (optical-potential) evaluation and self-consistent (coherent-potential) schemes, and it clarifies what microstructural information is required to improve predictions. We show that the self-consistent closure can be written as a Riccati-type fixed-point problem; in our tests this form is numerically convenient and gives similar effective moduli as the self-consistent scheme so-called coherent-potential approximation (CPA). Across the parameter ranges considered, the centered one-pass evaluation provides a particularly favorable accuracy-cost trade-off. The framework also supports non-ellipsoidal pore and grain shapes through inclusion-averaged one-body blocks and admits systematic higher-order corrections when needed. To demonstrate geophysical relevance, we introduce a pressure-dependent comparison medium based on contact-mechanics scalings and validate the resulting pressure-dependent moduli against laboratory measurements for a sandstone. Overall, the proposed formulation provides a practical route to pressure-dependent rock-physics modeling while making explicit the assumptions and limits behind commonly used T-matrix and effective-medium theory variants.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221726455 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag437
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.