Waiting for elective orthopaedic surgery: A qualitative scoping review of the patient experience

Clicks: 8
ID: 332030
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #145 of 154 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 154 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Public health waiting lists for elective or planned orthopaedic surgery are increasing to the point where demand far exceeds our ability to treat. This is largely due to ageing populations, rising obesity and the continued impact of delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While waiting, patients suffer debilitating physical pain, functional limitation, social isolation and associated mental health impacts while some are unable to work. This qualitative scoping review explored and mapped the experiences of patients of waiting for elective or planned orthopaedic surgery. Methods This review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A comprehensive database search was conducted to identify English language articles from 2009 until June 2025. Data extraction was informed by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results were thematically analysed and presented using the Quality Health Outcomes Model. Results The initial search identified 4713 articles, of which, 21 manuscripts met inclusion criteria. The 21 articles comprised 17 primary qualitative research studies and four review articles published within the designated time period (2009 to 2025). Two key themes were identified: 1. Patients waiting for elective orthopaedic surgery need psychosocial support and 2. System-level, multi-factorial communication issues with the waiting list leave patients feeling lost between primary and specialist care. These themes suggest that the challenges faced due to lengthy elective surgery waiting lists are not simply a capacity issue, but also a challenge of coordinated, patient- centred care. Conclusion Waiting for surgery is consistently described by patients as a source of anxiety and distress. With waiting list times for elective surgery increasing, the experience can be improved in part with adequate communication from healthcare providers. A re-focus on what matters most to the patient and their family is required in order to deliver adequate patient-centred care while patients wait for surgery.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221313604 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Elizabeth Walkley, Katheryn Hall, Dannielle Hopkinson, Mina Nichols‐Boyd, Elise Williams, Nicole Pope
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzag164
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag164
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.